The true meaning of Trump's choice for America's new top spy
Wasteman Goldmineovich saw the videos. "They sent a Jim Carrey clone to some French awards ceremony," the description reads — deadpan, conspiratorial, and somehow totally plausible in a world that has spent years testing what we'll believe. The piece forces the fundamental anxiety of public performance: is the person in front of you the one you think you're watching? The question sounds absurd until you hold it next to the news that Trump has made his choice for America's next intelligence director. Intelligence work is, professionally, the management of this exact uncertainty — who is actually in the room, who is performing which identity for which audience, and who holds the authority to declare what's real. The Director of National Intelligence doesn't just collect information; they curate what the government officially believes. Wasteman's piece refuses to be ironic about its own premise. It presents the clone theory with the same matter-of-fact sincerity one might use to describe seeing a car accident. That's the precise register in which conspiracy and officialdom are starting to blur — not melodrama, but bureaucratic calm. Both the art and the news story ask the same question from opposite ends of the credibility spectrum: who, exactly, is running things?
(not) Jim Carrey
by Wasteman Goldmineovich
"They sent a Jim Carrey clone to some French awards ceremony. I didn't believe it at first but then I watched the YouTube videos. It makes you wonder who else they've cloned."
View on objkt →